Legal Opinion
State v. Parmelee
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided May 24, 2004No. 51624-8-I, 52072-5-IPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
90 P.3d 1092 (2004)
121 Wash.App. 707
STATE of Washington, Respondent,
v.
Allan Wesley PARMELEE, Appellant.
Nos. 51624-8-I, 52072-5-I.
Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1.
May 24, 2004.
Christopher Gibson, Attorney at Law, Seattle, WA, for Appellant.
Andrea R. Vitalich, King Co. Prosecutors Office, Seattle, WA, for Respondent.
Opinion Published in Part
COLEMAN, J.
A defendant's due process rights are violated if judicial vindictiveness plays a role in resentencing after a successful appeal. To protect against vindictiveness, the United States Supreme Court, in North Carolina v. Pearce, 395 U.S.…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Alabama v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Colten v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Chaffin v. StynchcombeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Wasman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. BrunaNebraska Court of Appeals · 2006
- Parmelee v. ClarkeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- State Of Washington v. Clifton Kelly BellCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013