State Of Washington v. Clifton Kelly Bell
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the Court
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON STATE OF WASHINGTON, ) No. 67910-4-1 CO Respondent, ) DIVISION ONE ro v. ) UNPUBLISHED OPINION CLIFTON KELLY BELL, ,-->(/•; V? Appellant. ) FILED: July 29, 2013 05 ,-•"• -"ZT-. GROSSE, J. — An increased sentence following a criminal defendant's successful appeal violates due process if vindictiveness played a role in the resentencing. Here, Clifton Bell's increased sentence on remand did not violate due process because it was imposed by a different judge and there is no basis for concluding that the sentence was vindictive. Nor is there any…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Alabama v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Colten v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Chaffin v. StynchcombeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas v. McCulloughSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- State v. HughesWashington Supreme Court · 2005
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.