Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

In re Morton

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided February 27, 1987No. 585S213Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partShepard, Justice

While I concur with the majority’s finding that Morton is guilty of misconduct, I cannot join in the decision to sanction his actions with a three year suspension. My review of similar disciplinary actions indicates that this penalty is disproportionately high.

The majority has described well Morton’s misdeeds. He failed to account properly to his client for some $2000 collected on his behalf and failed to turn over the client’s funds promptly when requested to do so. Only after the client hired counsel to assist in pursuing his demands did Morton comply. While holding the client’s money,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Matter of WatsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1985
  2. In the Matter of BraultIndiana Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Matter of WirtIndiana Supreme Court · 1985
  4. In re BoldenIndiana Supreme Court · 1985
  5. In re BriscoeIndiana Supreme Court · 1984

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API