Legal Opinion

In re Bolden

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided October 29, 1985No. 784S279PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

This cause was initiated pursuant to Admission and Discipline Rule 23, Section 12, by the filing of a three count complaint charging the Respondent, Clarence D. Bol-den, with professional misconduct. Specifically, the Disciplinary Commission of this Court has charged that the Respondent has violated Disciplinary Rules 1-102(A)(8), (4), (5) and (6), 5-108(B), 6-101(A)8), T-101(A)(3) and 9-102(B)(8) of the Code of Professional Responsibility for Attorneys ot Law.

*572The parties now have tendered to this Court a "Statement of Cireumstances and Conditional Agreement for Discipline." Additionally, the…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re MortonIndiana Supreme Court · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API