Matter of Wirt
Indiana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
DISCIPLINARY ACTION
2Per curiam
This case is before us on a three-count Verified Complaint filed by the Indiana Supreme Court Disciplinary Commission. The Hearing Officer appointed pursuant to Admission and Discipline Rule 28, has filed his Findings of Fact and Conclusions. Neither the Respondent nor the Disciplinary Commission have challenged the Report of the Hearing Officer.
Having considered all matters submitted in this case, this Court finds that the Hearing Officer's findings of fact should be adopted. Accordingly, we find under Count I that in May, 1981, William G. Allen requested the Respondent to…
3Cases cited3 opinions
- Matter of WelkeIndiana Supreme Court · 1984
- Matter of AungstIndiana Supreme Court · 1984
- Matter of AllenIndiana Supreme Court · 1984
4Cited by3 opinions
- In re BryantIndiana Supreme Court · 1988
- In re MortonIndiana Supreme Court · 1987
- In re WirtIndiana Supreme Court · 1989