Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Foley v. Hamilton

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided October 24, 1983PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FONES, Chief Justice.

This case involves provisions of Tennessee’s regional planning law, T.C.A. § 13-3-101, et seq.

*357I.

Plaintiffs, homeowners in Huskey Groves Estates Subdivision located in Sevier County, Tennessee, brought suit against (1) the subdivision developers, Robert Hamilton and Harry Roberts, (2) the Gatlinburg Regional Planning Commission, an agency of the City of Gatlinburg, and (3) Sevier County, for a determination of liability for the maintenance of certain roads within the subdivision and for damages.

The facts adduced at trial reveal that the subdivision in question was…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Oliver v. KingTennessee Supreme Court · 1981
  2. City of Lenoir City v. State ex rel. City of LoudonTennessee Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Marion County Board of Commissioners v. Marion County Election CommissionTennessee Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Foley v. HamiltonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1980

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Paduch v. City of Johnson CityTennessee Supreme Court · 1995
  2. General Care Corp. v. OlsenTennessee Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Hackett v. Smith CountyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1990
  4. State ex rel. Kessel v. AsheTennessee Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Lake County v. TruettCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1988

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API