Legal Opinion
State v. Gee
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided September 6, 1988No. 20529-3-IPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtScholfield, C.J.
The defendant, Randy Gee, appeals his conviction for delivery of cocaine, a violation of the Uniform Controlled Substances Act. We affirm.
Facts
Detective Charles Vance, a Bellevue police officer working under cover, was assigned to a special investigations narcotics unit. In July 1985, a confidential informant introduced Vance to Lea Ann Barrey, and Vance made a small purchase of cocaine at that time.
In September 1985, Vance negotiated with Barrey for a larger purchase of cocaine. He met with her on September 13, 1985, in a parking lot, to receive the cocaine. Vance testified that after he…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- United States v. LovascoSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- State v. ParrisWashington Supreme Court · 1982
- State v. ValladaresWashington Supreme Court · 1983
- United States v. Luis Oscar Sarmiento-PerezCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- United States v. Robert BenvenisteCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. WhelchelWashington Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. PotterCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1992
- State v. MartinezCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1995
- State v. NorbyWashington Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. AllenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1992
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.