State v. Norby
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.
The State charged the defendants in this appeal with various felony drug or theft charges arising from separate incidents. These charges were filed anywhere from 6 to 33 months after the defendants allegedly committed the crimes in question. The defendants each raised motions to dismiss, arguing their due process rights were violated by this preaccusatorial delay. The trial court consolidated these cases for the purposes of the motion, and granted the defendants' motion to compel the State to answer detailed interrogatories about police and prosecutorial investigative and charging practices,…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Rochin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- United States v. LovascoSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- State v. GunwallWashington Supreme Court · 1986
- State v. BlackwellWashington Supreme Court · 1993
- United States v. Arturo Gonzalez-SandovalCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- State v. RohrichWashington Supreme Court · 2003
- State v. RohrichWashington Supreme Court · 2003
- W.R. Grace & Co. v. Department of RevenueWashington Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. SalaveaWashington Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. SalaveaWashington Supreme Court · 2004
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.