Legal Opinion

Carter v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp.

District Court, E.D. Texas

Decided March 1, 1983No. Civ. A. B-79-238-CAPublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

ROBERT M. PARKER, District Judge.

The parties to this, cause have stipulated to certain facts, for purposes of this cause only, to perfect an appeal of the issue whether a manufacturer may defeat a strict liability claim, based in part on lack of adequate warnings on its products containing asbestos, by proving that it did not know and, held to the knowledge and skill of an expert, could not reasonably have known or foreseen the potential dangers of exposure to such products. This is what asbestos defendants refer to as the “state of the art” defense. For reasons…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Greenman v. Yuba Power Products, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Clarence Borel v. Fibreboard Paper Products Corporation, Nationalsurety Corporation, Intervenor-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
  4. McKisson v. Sales Affiliates, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Boatland of Houston, Inc. v. BaileyTexas Supreme Court · 1980

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Halphen v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1986
  2. USX Corp. v. Salinas, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1991
  3. Bernier v. Raymark Industries, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1986
  4. Temple EasTex, Inc. v. Old Orchard Creek Partners, Ltd., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1992
  5. Warner Fruehauf Trailer Co. v. BostonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API