Legal Opinion
USX Corp. v. Salinas
Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)
Decided September 18, 1991No. 04-89-00607-CVPublishedCited by 69 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ON APPELLANT’S MOTION FOR REHEARING AND APPELLEES’ MOTIONS FOR REHEARING
BIERY, Justice.
This court’s opinion of June 19, 1991, is withdrawn and the following opinion is substituted. The motions for rehearing of Advanced Petroleum, Javier Salinas, and Luther Durden are denied. The motion for rehearing of USX concerning indemnity against Advanced Petroleum is granted. The remainder of the USX motion for rehearing is denied.
This is a products liability case involving a defectively made hydraulic cylinder which resulted in the collapse of the oil rig elevator of which the cylinder was a part. The…
2Cases cited54 opinions
- In Re King's EstateTexas Supreme Court · 1951
- Cain v. BainTexas Supreme Court · 1986
- Garza v. AlviarTexas Supreme Court · 1965
- Pool v. Ford Motor Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1986
- Glover v. Texas General Indemnity Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1981
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by69 opinions
- Michel v. Rocket Engineering Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2001
- Sipes v. General Motors Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)1997
- Gerstacker v. Blum Consulting Engineers, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1994
- Torres v. Caterpillar, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1996
- Cartwright v. MBank Corpus Christi, N.A., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1993
64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.