Warner Fruehauf Trailer Co. v. Boston
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
BELSON, Senior Judge:
This is an appeal from the trial court’s decision to set aside the original jury verdict in favor of defendant Warner Fruehauf Trailer Company, Inc. and from its subsequent decision to grant a directed verdict in favor of plaintiffs William and Elizabeth Boston at a second trial. On appeal, Warner Fruehauf argues that the trial court erred in ruling that the assumption of risk instruction it gave the jury during the first trial was unwarranted and required the court to strike the defense verdict, and that the trial court’s decision to grant plaintiffs a directed verdict…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Judith Brochu and Emmanuel T. Brochu v. Ortho Pharmaceutical CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1981
- O'BRIEN v. Muskin Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1983
- State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Chrysler Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1988
- Russell Eugene Hurd v. American Hoist and Derrick Company, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1984
- Sinai v. Polinger Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Sharon Rollins v. Wackenhut Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2012
- Potter v. Chicago Pneumatic Tool Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- Smith v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 1998
- McNeil Pharmaceutical v. HawkinsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
- Witherspoon v. Philip Morris Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 1997
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.