Petsch v. Florom

RAPER, Justice.

The defendant-appellant brings this case to us, not relying upon any error in the rulings of the court or its instructions during the trial of the case. He candidly admits that the verdict of a jury will not ordinarily be disturbed where the evidence is conflicting but he claims that this case is outside the general rule for the reasons:

1. That there is no credible or substantial evidence in the record to support the verdict of the jury.

2. That there is no conflict in the credible or substantial evidence submitted in this matter, and all such credible and substantial evidence…