Legal Opinion

State v. Pomroy.

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided January 31, 2014No. SCWC-29688PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

McKENNA, J.

1. Introduction

At issue in this appeal is whether Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant Henry Pomroy (“Pomroy”) was adequately informed of his right to testify. Pomroy presents the following questions on certiorari:

A Whether the Intermediate Court of Appeals determined in error that the district court’s failure to advise petitioner pri- or to start of trial of his right to testify did not warrant reversal of the trial court’s judgment of conviction.

B. Whether the Intermediate Court of Appeals determined in error that the district court’s Tachibana[ 1 ] colloquy was…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Tachibana v. StateHawaii Supreme Court · 1995
  2. State v. JonesHawaii Supreme Court · 2001
  3. State v. SilvaHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1995
  4. State v. MatavaleHawaii Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Bhakta v. County of MauiHawaii Supreme Court · 2005

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. Monteil.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2014
  2. State v. Eduwensuyi.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2018
  3. State v. Celestine.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2018
  4. State v. Kim.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2017
  5. State v. IchimuraHawaii Supreme Court · 2017

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API