State v. Pomroy.
Hawaii Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court by
McKENNA, J.
1. Introduction
At issue in this appeal is whether Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant Henry Pomroy (“Pomroy”) was adequately informed of his right to testify. Pomroy presents the following questions on certiorari:
A Whether the Intermediate Court of Appeals determined in error that the district court’s failure to advise petitioner pri- or to start of trial of his right to testify did not warrant reversal of the trial court’s judgment of conviction.
B. Whether the Intermediate Court of Appeals determined in error that the district court’s Tachibana[ 1 ] colloquy was…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Tachibana v. StateHawaii Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. JonesHawaii Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. SilvaHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1995
- State v. MatavaleHawaii Supreme Court · 2007
- Bhakta v. County of MauiHawaii Supreme Court · 2005
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. Monteil.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2014
- State v. Eduwensuyi.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2018
- State v. Celestine.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2018
- State v. Kim.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2017
- State v. IchimuraHawaii Supreme Court · 2017
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.