Legal Opinion

Whitfield v. Hanges

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided May 10, 1920No. 4902PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Northern 'District of Iowa; Henry T. Reed, Judge. Habeas corpus by George Ranges and .others hgainst S. I,. Whitfield, Immigration Officer. From a judgment discharging petitioners, respondent appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

SANBORN, Circuit Judge.

Pursuant to the opinion and direction of this court in Whitfield, Immigration Inspector, v. Hanges et al., 222 Fed. 745, 755, 756, 138 C. C. A. 199, the court below has tried on the merits de novo on evidence introduced before that court the question whether or not the resident aliens, Hanges and others, were guilty of the charges made against them in the warrant for their arrest, found that there was no evidence to support those charges, and has ordered and decreed that the writ of habeas corpus in their behalf be sustained, that each of them be discharged, and that…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Martin v. Hunter's LesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1816
  2. Roberts v. CooperSupreme Court of the United States · 1858
  3. Whitfield v. HangesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1915
  4. Corning v. the Troy Iron and Nail FactorySupreme Court of the United States · 1854
  5. Coal & Iron Ry. Co. v. ReherdCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1915

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. City and County of Denver v. Denver Tramway CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1927
  2. Minneapolis Steel & Machinery Co. v. Federal Surety Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API