Legal Opinion
Minneapolis Steel & Machinery Co. v. Federal Surety Co.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided July 23, 1929No. 8237PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OTIS, District Judge.
This case is here on a second appeal. The facts are these:
H. M. Buell, doing business under the firm name of Buell Bridge Company, on the 16th day of September, 1921, signed and entered into a contract with the state highway department of the state of Montana for the construction of a bridge on a highway in that state. To insure the faithful performance of that contract, Buell as principal, and the appellee as surety, on the 16th day of September, 1921, executed to the state highway department for the state of Montana a surety bond. This was in accordance with a…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Messenger v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Supervisors v. KennicottSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Guarantee Co. of North America v. Phenix Ins.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1903
- Clark v. KeithSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Lyman v. City of LincolnNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- United States v. Martin Floyd BenningCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2001
- Aetna Life Ins. Co. of Hartford, Conn. v. MaxwellCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1937
- National Surety Co. of New York v. UlmenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1933
- Millers' Mut. Fire Ins. Ass'n of Illinois v. BellCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1938
- Thomas A. Drinan, Etc. v. A. J. Lindemann & Hoverson Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1956
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.