Legal Opinion

Stacy v. ENERGY MANAGEMENT GROUP LTD.

Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)

Decided July 2, 1987No. 01-86-0711-CVPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DUNN, Justice.

This is an appeal from a summary judgment awarding the appellee recovery on a promissory note. The appellee was awarded $10,080 in principal and interest and $3,500 in attorney’s fees.

In two points of error, the appellant contends (1) that the trial court erred in granting summary judgment because there was insufficient evidence to support the summary judgment and (2) that the court erred in granting judgment against Don Stacy in his personal capacity.

Rule 166-A of the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure provides that upon a motion for summary judgment, the adverse party may file and…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. City of Houston v. Clear Creek Basin AuthorityTexas Supreme Court · 1979
  2. INA of Texas v. BryantTexas Supreme Court · 1985
  3. A to Z Rental Center v. BurrisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1986
  4. Carter v. WaltonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1971
  5. Walker v. Horine, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1985

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Daniell v. Citizens Bank, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1988
  2. TPS Freight Distributors, Inc. v. Texas Commerce Bank-DallasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1990
  3. Playboy Enterprises, Inc. v. Javier Sanchez-CampuzCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2013
  4. Herod v. DMS Solutions IncDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2024
  5. Shannon McClary and Tina McClary v. Harvest Fuels, LLC, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API