Legal Opinion

Associates Discount Corp. v. Laniefsky

Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division

Decided March 10, 1942No. 3113Published

1Opinion of the Court

SULLIVAN, J. (Pettingell, P. J., and Gadsby, J.)

This is an action in contract for balance dud predicated on a con' ditional sales contract of a used Ford automobile, in the sum of $88.30 with interest thereon from the date of default and demand under the contract. The evidence in this cause is set out in the trial court’s finding of facts which are summarized in the following manner: The defendant purchased of the Johnson Pontiac Co. of Lexington by a written contract, under the date of January 15, (1940) a used Ford automobile for the sum of $458.18, the title to remain in the seller or…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Home Savings Bank v. SavranskyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
  2. Commissioner of Banks v. T. C. Lee & Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
  3. Commonwealth v. WhitcombMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API