Associates Discount Corp. v. Laniefsky
Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division
1Opinion of the Court
SULLIVAN, J. (Pettingell, P. J., and Gadsby, J.)
This is an action in contract for balance dud predicated on a con' ditional sales contract of a used Ford automobile, in the sum of $88.30 with interest thereon from the date of default and demand under the contract. The evidence in this cause is set out in the trial court’s finding of facts which are summarized in the following manner: The defendant purchased of the Johnson Pontiac Co. of Lexington by a written contract, under the date of January 15, (1940) a used Ford automobile for the sum of $458.18, the title to remain in the seller or…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Home Savings Bank v. SavranskyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
- Commissioner of Banks v. T. C. Lee & Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
- Commonwealth v. WhitcombMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931