Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Whitcomb

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided October 1, 1931PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C.J.

This indictment charged the defendant in two counts with committing unnatural and lascivious acts with a young woman. G. L. c. 272, § 35. The only question raised is whether a verdict ought to have been directed in favor of the defendant. There was ample evidence, which need not be narrated nor summarized, to support the charge. There is nothing inconsistent with this result in Commonwealth v. Delano, 197 Mass. 166. If it be assumed, but without so deciding, that there was evidence sufficient to prove a different crime from that laid in the indictment, the jury were not obliged to believe…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. RussMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1919
  2. Sullivan v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
  3. Whiteacre v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
  4. Haun v. LeGrandMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
  5. Goodell v. SviokclaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. DiStasioMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
  2. Commonwealth v. AlbertMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
  3. Commonwealth v. LelandMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
  4. Associates Discount Corp. v. LaniefskyMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API