Legal Opinion

Ward Eggleston Galleries v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided January 4, 1955No. C. D. 1670PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JohnsoN, Judge:

This is a protest against the collector’s assessment of duty on a bronze sculpture, known as “Roger and Angelique,” at 10 per centum ad valorem under paragraph 1547 (a) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by the Annecy Protocol of Terms of Accession to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, T. D. 52373, and the President’s proclamation of May 13, 1950, T. D. 52476, under the provision for “Works of art, not specially provided for: Statuary, sculptures, or copies, replicas, or reproductions thereof, valued at not less than $2.50.” It is claimed that the article is…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. DowningCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1916
  2. Gregory v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1954
  3. United States v. TiffanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1908

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lang v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1960
  2. Elder v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API