Lauman v. Foster
Supreme Court of Iowa
'Appeal from Des Moines District Court. — Hon. W. S. Withrow, Judge. Suit to require defendants, as trustees of the estate of George O. Lauman, to pay to plaintiff certain moneys as income derived therefrom; the same having been obtained by virtue of being given the right, as stockholders in a bank, to subscribe for additional stock. The petition was dismissed and plaintiff appeals. —
1Opinion of the CourtLadd, J.
— The plaintiff is the widow of George C. Lauman, who died many years ago. His will was admitted to probate, and therein, among other provisions, he bequeathed his personal estate to three trustees, directing them to deal with it substantially as he might have done, if living, and “that all the rest and residue of my estate be held together, without division, by my trustees during the life of my wife, to whom they shall pay the entire net income of my estate, after deducting taxes and proper expenses of the trust. Payments of the income shall be made every three months, beginning with the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Gibbons v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- In Re the Final Accounting of KernochanNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
- Hite's Devisees v. Hite'sCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1892
- Kalbach v. ClarkSupreme Court of Iowa · 1907
- Spooner v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1892
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Nirdlinger's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
- Birmingham v. CongerMississippi Supreme Court · 1969
- Stipe v. First National BankOregon Supreme Court · 1956
- MacEachron v. Trustees of Iowa CollegeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1920
- Robert v. Mercantile Trust Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1929
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.