Legal Opinion

Spooner v. Phillips

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided May 28, 1892PublishedCited by 39 opinions

New Haven & Fairfield Cos., April T., 1892. Andrews, C. J., Carpenter, Seymour, Torrance and Fenn, Js. Suit for recovery in equity of sixty-six shares of stock of the Adams Express Company, held by the defendant Phillips as trustee; brought to the Superior Court in Fair-field County.

Read the full summary

New Haven & Fairfield Cos., April T., 1892. Andrews, C. J., Carpenter, Seymour, Torrance and Fenn, Js. Suit for recovery in equity of sixty-six shares of stock of the Adams Express Company, held by the defendant Phillips as trustee; brought to the Superior Court in Fair-field County. The defendant Henry R. Parrott, administrator of the estate of Mary Ann Garland, the original beneficiary for her life under the trust, filed an answer and counterclaim, setting up a claim in behalf of her estate to fifty-six shares of the stock, and the court ordered an inter-pleader between the plaintiff and…

1Opinion of the CourtCarpenter, J.

The plaintiff in 1857 transferred to Daniel Phillips, in trust for the use of Mary Ann Garland for life, or until she should marry, ten shares of the stock of the Adams Express Company, a joint stock association organized under the laws of the state of New York, by an instrument in writing, as follows:

“Know all men by these presents that I, Clapp Spooner, of the city of Bridgeport, in Fairfield County, Connecticut, for value received, have bargained, sold, assigned and transferred, and by these presents do bargain, sell, assign and transfer, unto Daniel Phillips, of Hartford, ten shares of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Gibbons v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  2. Minot v. PaineMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868
  3. Rand v. HubbellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1874
  4. Pratt v. Pratt, Read & Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1866
  5. Phelps v. Farmers & Mechanics BankSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1857

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. In re Judicial Settlement of the Accounts of RogersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897
  2. Hayes v. St. Louis Union Trust Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1927
  3. Kalbach v. ClarkSupreme Court of Iowa · 1907
  4. DeKoven v. DeKovenIllinois Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Smith v. HooperCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1902

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API