Legal Opinion

Lawrence E. Tierney Coal Co. v. Smith's Guardian

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided June 4, 1918PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Pike Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Carroll

Reversing.

This case presents the important question, whether a circuit court, pursuant to legislative authority so to do, has the power to lease the mineral land of infants for a term of years beyond their minority, and brings before us the validity of the legislative act, attempting to confer upon the circuit court the power exercised in this case.

The question comes up in this way: In 1916 the legislature enacted a statute providing in section 1: “That the guardian of an infant, curator or the committee of a person of unsound mind may lease the real…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. TERRETT & OTHERS v. Taylor & OthersSupreme Court of the United States · 1815
  2. People v. MorrisNew York Supreme Court · 1835
  3. Commonwealth v. GoldburgCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
  4. Elliott v. FowlerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1901
  5. Walker v. Smyser's ex'rsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1882

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Palagi v. ReganMontana Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Jones v. Prairie Oil & Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
  3. Kentland Coal & Coke Co. v. Coleman's GuardianCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932
  4. Lawrence E. Tierney Coal Co. v. Smith's GuardianCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1918
  5. Montgomery Ward & Co. v. Norton's TrusteeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API