Legal Opinion

People v. Morris

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1835PublishedCited by 70 opinions

Error from the St. Lawrence oyer and terminer. The defendant was tried on an indictment for selling spirituous liquors andpermittingthesametobe drank in his grocery store, without having obtained a license as a tavern keeper.

Read the full summary

Error from the St. Lawrence oyer and terminer. The defendant was tried on an indictment for selling spirituous liquors andpermittingthesametobe drank in his grocery store, without having obtained a license as a tavern keeper. On the trial, he admitted that on various days between the 10th October and the 16th December, 1833, he sold spirituous liquors in his grocery, in the village of Ogde?zs5wrg-A,received pay for the same, and permitted the liquor to be drank in his grocery, and that he had not at the time a license to keep a tavern ; but he insisted that he had a right so to do by virtue…

1Opinion of the Court

By the court,

Nelson, J.

The defendant insists that the statute under which he has been convicted is inoperative, upon the grounds, 1. That the power or franchise of the corporation of the village of Ogdensburgh to grant licenses to grocers to sell spirituous liquors to be drank in their houses is a vested right, and cannot be impaired or taken away; and 2. That if *328guch power can be taken away, it can be done only by bill having the assent of two-thirds of the members elected to each branch of the legislature, in conformity to the 9th § of the 7th art. of the constitution of the state.

As to the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Ex parte Harrington & Hubbell v. Trustees of the Village of RochesterNew York Supreme Court · 1833

3Cited by70 opinions

  1. Mobile v. WatsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Darlington v. . Mayor, C., of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1865
  3. Crenshaw v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  4. People Ex Rel. New York Electric Lines Co. v. SquireNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
  5. City of Clinton v. Cedar Rapids & Missouri River RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1868

65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API