Legal Opinion

Hill, Lehnen & Driskill v. Barter Systems, Inc.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided April 1, 1986No. WD 37173PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KENNEDY, Judge.

Plaintiff law firm got out an execution on their $2,982.72 Ray County Associate Circuit Court judgment against Barter Systems, Inc., and directed the service of garnishment summons on the Mercantile Bank of Kansas City. In response to plaintiffs interrogatory whether the bank had “an account ... in the name of Barter Systems, Inc.”, the bank answered, “Yes”. The answer to another interrogatory disclosed that the amount in the account at the time of garnishment was $9,174.38, substantially exceeding the amount of the judgment. The court thereupon on September 27 entered an order…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Lance v. Van WinkleSupreme Court of Missouri · 1948
  2. State Ex Rel. Abeille Fire Insurance v. SevierSupreme Court of Missouri · 1934
  3. Borrson v. Missouri-Kansas-Texas RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1943
  4. Linenschmidt v. Continental Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1947
  5. De Mayo v. LyonsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1950

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Boyd McGathey v. Matthew K. Davis TrustMissouri Court of Appeals · 2015
  2. Miller-Stauch Construction Co. v. Williams-Bungart Electric, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1998
  3. Adelman-Adler v. KeathleyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996
  4. S.A. v. JodoinMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993
  5. Pinkstaff v. HillMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API