Jackson Hewitt, Inc. v. J2 Financial Services, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
REBECCA BEACH SMITH, District Judge.
This ease is before the Court on Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss or Stay. Defendants present two arguments: (1) that the Court should abstain because the case involves unsettled issues of state law important to California public policy; and (2) that the Court should dismiss under the Colorado River doctrine of abstention in deference to ongoing litigation between the parties in California state court. See Colorado River Water Conservation Dist. v. United States, 424 U.S. 800, 817, 96 S.Ct. 1236, 1246, 47 L.Ed.2d 483 (1976).
I. Factual and Procedural…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- The Bremen v. Zapata Off-Shore Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Brillhart v. Excess Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Noell Crane Systems GmbH v. Noell Crane & Service, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2009
- Allied Nut and Bolt, Inc. v. NSS Industries, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1996
- Vance v. Boyd Mississippi, Inc.District Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1996
- Baseline Sports, Inc. v. Third Base SportsDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2004
- Alami v. Lincoln Property Co.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2014