Legal Opinion

Beery v. Hurd

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided April 20, 1938No. Gen. No. 9,055PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Biess

Plaintiff appellants, as judgment creditors, filed a verified bill of complaint in chancery under the former Practice Act, praying discovery of assets of defendant appellee Walter S. Hurd alleged to be held by Martha Hurd or Lillian Hurd and seeking to set aside two certain deeds from said defendants Walter S. Hurd and Lillian Hurd, his wife, conveying to Martha Hurd, his mother, all interest in a residence property in Decatur, Macon county, and in and to 320 acres of farm land, being the north half of a certain Section 36 in Piatt county, on the ground that the deeds were fraudulent, made…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Fish v. FarwellIllinois Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Byerly v. ByerlyIllinois Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Higgins v. HigginsIllinois Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Emory v. KeighanIllinois Supreme Court · 1880
  5. Third National Bank v. NorrisIllinois Supreme Court · 1928

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Central Production Credit Ass'n v. HansAppellate Court of Illinois · 1989
  2. Gentile v. GentileAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980
  3. Albers v. SmileyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1939
  4. Seaborn v. MillerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1944
  5. Shae Kevin Graham v. Sharea FosterMichigan Supreme Court · 2017

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API