United States v. Spivack
District Court, E.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM & ORDER
AZRACK, United States Magistrate Judge:
By order dated October 4, 2007, defendant’s motion to compel discovery was referred to me for decision by the Honorable Edward R. Korman, United States District Judge. A hearing on the motion was held on November 8, 2007. Based on my review of the parties’ submissions, the parties’ oral arguments, and for the reasons stated herein, I deny defendant’s motion to compel disclosure of the mirror image of the computer hard drive seized from the defendant’s computer.
I. BACKGROUND
The defendant is charged with transporting child pornography by…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Dickerson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Ashcroft v. Free Speech CoalitionSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- United States v. KnellingerDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2007
- United States v. O'RourkeDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2007
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. ScolesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2013
- State v. GRENNINGWashington Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. GrenningWashington Supreme Court · 2010
- United States v. MitchellDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2015