United States v. Mitchell
District Court, E.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
KIMBERLY J. MUELLER, District Judge.
Defendant Albert Mitchell is charged with knowingly receiving child pornography in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2252(a)(2). He seeks an order compelling the government to provide him with a mirror copy of the computer media seized from him. (ECF No. 90.) He agrees to a protective order under which all materials will be accessible to defense attorneys, paralegals, and experts only, on a confidential basis. The government refuses to produce the materials, arguing it is prohibited from doing under 18 U.S.C. § 3509(m), a provision of the Adam Walsh Act.1 After…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Ake v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. David SilvermanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- United States v. WrightCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- United States v. CordyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.