Wenger v. Lumisys, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS WITH LEAVE TO AMEND AND GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO STRIKE
WHYTE, District Judge.
Before the court are two motions to dismiss pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) and 9(b), and the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (“Reform Act”). One motion was brought on behalf of defendants Lumisys, Inc. (“Lumi-sys” or “Company”), Stephen J. Weiss, Craig Klosterman, John M. Burgess, Linden J. Li-voni, Eystein G. Thordarson, Douglas G. De-Vivo, Jesse I. Treu, Helios Partners Limited Partnership and…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- United States v. American Trucking AssociationsSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Central Bank of Denver, N. A. v. First Interstate Bank of Denver, N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
- McHenry v. RenneCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Howard Wool v. Tandem Computers Incorporated, Robert C. Marshall, Henry v. Morgan, and James G. TreybigCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by65 opinions
- Nursing Home Pension Fund, Local 144 v. Oracle Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- In Re Splash Technology Holdings Inc. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2001
- In Re Copper Mountain Securities LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2004
- In Re Peritos Software Services, Inc. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1999
- In Re Securities Litigation BMC Software, Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2001
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.