Shea v. Falk
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the CourtCoon, J.
Pursuant to what is now article XI of the Civil Service Law, the State of New York has set up a State Health Insurance Program. The sole issue on this appeal is the eligibility of the petitioners to enroll and participate in such program, and determinative of that issue is a construction of subdivision 1 of section 163 of the Civil Service Law, which reads: ‘ ‘ All persons in the service of the state, whether elected, appointed or employed, who elect to participate in such health insurance plan shall be eligible to participate therein, provided, however, that the board may adopt such…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- McCluskey v. . CromwellNew York Court of Appeals · 1854
- In re the Accounting of Guaranty Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1956
- In re the Accounting of RathscheckNew York Court of Appeals · 1950
- Olmsted v. . MeahlNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
- Matter of Flaherty v. . CraigNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Ashland Equities Co. v. ClerkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- Perea v. Board of Torrance County CommissionersNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
- Gordon v. BursteinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- Fay v. ReganAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Doctors Council v. New York City Employees' Retirement SystemAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987