Legal Opinion

Fay v. Regan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 8, 1983PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Kane, J. P.

The facts of this case are not disputed. Petitioners Oscar Awe and John Fay have been harness racing judges in the State of New York since 1954 and 1956, respectively. Both petitioners submitted applications to the State Harness Racing Commission (commission) to become racing judges. *193Petitioner Fay was interviewed by the commissioner and petitioner Awe was interviewed by the deputy commissioner. Following their interviews, each petitioner was sent a letter of appointment by the commissioner and was directed to report to a specific racetrack at a certain date and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Catena v. New York State Employees' Retirement SystemAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  2. Shea v. FalkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1960
  3. Barnett v. LevittAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
  4. Shea v. FalkNew York Court of Appeals · 1960

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Siepierski v. New York State & Local Retirement SystemAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  2. Port Authority Police Benevolent Ass'n v. AnglinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API