Legal Opinion
Atianza v. United States Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corp.
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided August 26, 1924PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GARVIN, District Judge.
This is a motion by the plaintiff, who appears specially for the purposes of this motion only, to remand this action to the Supreme Court, County of Richmond. The suit was commenced in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of Richmond, by the service of a summons and complaint on July 14, 1924. On August 4th, defendants caused it to be removed from the New York Supremo Court to this court.
The action is brought pursuant to section 33 of the Merchant Marino Act of 1920 (Comp. St. Ann. Supp. 1923, § 8337a), which act provides in part that all statutes of the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Caceres v. United States Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 1924
- Wenzler v. Robin Line S. S. Co.District Court, W.D. Washington · 1921
- Lorang v. Alaska S. S. Co.District Court, W.D. Washington · 1924
- Beer v. Clyde S. S. Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1923
- Malia v. Southern Pac. Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1923
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Goetz v. Interlake S. S. Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1931
- Greene v. United Fruit Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1949
- Kristiansen v. National Dredging Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1933
- Carroll v. SaulDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2021