Legal Opinion

Burik v. Dundee Woolen Co.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided June 10, 1901PublishedCited by 12 opinions

On rule to show cause.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Collins, J.

The plaintiff recovered a verdict in compensation for personal injuries sustained in the service of the defendant. His lower jaw was broken in three places by the flying fragments of a ffiiydro-extractor” that burst while revolving with great rapidity. It was used for drying rags that had been washed in a solution of vitriol, corrosive of the iron hoops surrounding the wooden staves of the extractor. The cause was tried before Mr. Justice Dixon at the Passaic Circuit, and was properly submitted to the jury on the question of the failure of…

2Cited by12 opinions

  1. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,534 United States of America v. John Dioguardi and Louis OstrerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
  2. Southern Pacific Co. v. GastelumArizona Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Bjorklund v. Seattle Electric Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Heuter v. Coastal Air Lines, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
  5. Ex Parte LoveladyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1947

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API