Smith v. Commonwealth
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
1Opinion of the Court
DAVIS, Commissioner.
A jury found appellant guilty of knowingly distributing obscene matter, as denounced by KRS 436.101, and fixed the punishment at a fine of $1,000. Attacking the judgment of conviction, appellant contends that (1) KRS 436.101 is unconstitutional for its failure to prescribe that proscribed material must be “utterly without redeeming social value”; (2) a directed ver- diet of acquittal was improperly denied; (3) the instructions were erroneous; and (4) the prosecution should have been dismissed because no adversary hearing had been held previously for the purpose of…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Jacobellis v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Marcus v. Search Warrant of PropertySupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- A Quantity of Copies of Books v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Delta Book Distributors, Inc. v. CronvichDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1969
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. HealdSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1973
- Keene v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1974
- Roaden v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1971
- Cherokee News & Arcade, Inc. v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1973
- Commonwealth v. DurhamKentucky Supreme Court · 2001
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.