Legal Opinion

Smith v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided February 26, 1971PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DAVIS, Commissioner.

A jury found appellant guilty of knowingly distributing obscene matter, as denounced by KRS 436.101, and fixed the punishment at a fine of $1,000. Attacking the judgment of conviction, appellant contends that (1) KRS 436.101 is unconstitutional for its failure to prescribe that proscribed material must be “utterly without redeeming social value”; (2) a directed ver- diet of acquittal was improperly denied; (3) the instructions were erroneous; and (4) the prosecution should have been dismissed because no adversary hearing had been held previously for the purpose of…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Jacobellis v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Marcus v. Search Warrant of PropertySupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  4. A Quantity of Copies of Books v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  5. Delta Book Distributors, Inc. v. CronvichDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1969

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. HealdSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1973
  2. Keene v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1974
  3. Roaden v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1971
  4. Cherokee News & Arcade, Inc. v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1973
  5. Commonwealth v. DurhamKentucky Supreme Court · 2001

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API