Legal Opinion
Richmond v. International Business MacHines Corp.
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided March 7, 1996No. 0:93-cv-03254PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
HURLEY, District Judge.
Currently pending before the Court in the above-captioned case are two motions to dismiss based upon the applicable statutes of limitations. Specifically, Ampex Corporation (“Ampex”) has moved to dismiss the claims against it by Plaintiff Connie L. Davis, and Hewlett-Packard Company (“Hewlett-Packard”) has moved to dismiss the claims against it by Plaintiff Rita B. Pritchard.
As explained below, the Court finds that it is not in a position to consider these motions, as it is not apparent from the pleadings that there exists complete diversity of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Freeport-McMoRan Inc. v. K N Energy, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Anisfeld v. Cantor Fitzgerald & Co., Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1986
- Hogan v. Consolidated Rail Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
- Neat-N-Tidy Co., Inc. v. Tradepower (Holdings) Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 1991
- Ganoe v. LummisDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1987
3Cited by7 opinions
- Colorado Capital v. OwensDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2005
- City of Cleveland ex rel. Wade v. City of ClevelandDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2014
- Farmers Propane, Inc. v. CHS, IncDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2020
- Kokosing Construction Company, Inc. v. Local 860 Laborers' International Union of North AmericaDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2019
- Meyer, Suozzi, English & Klein, P.C. v. HigbeeDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2020
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.