Legal Opinion

Mayor of Baltimore v. Crockett

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 12, 1980No. 1139, September Term, 1979PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.

On July 19, 1974, the Mayor of Baltimore approved Ordinance No. 701 which amended the City’s Comprehensive Rezoning Ordinance which had been passed and approved in 1971. The effect of the amendment was to prohibit sale or lease signs on individual residences in those parts of Baltimore which had been zoned "Residence and Office-Residence Districts.” The Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance had, prior to the amendment, permitted such signs. Curiously, the amendment permitted such signs within those districts on multiple-family dwellings, apartment hotels, and non-residential buildings. 1

James and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Virginia State Board of Pharmacy v. Virginia Citizens Consumer Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Whitney v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  3. Linmark Associates, Inc. v. Township of WillingboroSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Barrick Realty, Incorporated v. City of Gary, IndianaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1974
  5. Linmark Associates, Inc., and William Mellman v. The Township of Willingboro and Gerald DalyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. City of Chicago v. PrusAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983
  2. Greater Baltimore Board of Realtors v. HughesDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1984
  3. City of Chicago v. PrusAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981
  4. City of Chicago v. PrusAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API