City of Chicago v. Prus

SUPPLEMENTAL OPINION ON DENIAL OF REHEARING

Mr. PRESIDING JUSTICE SULLIVAN

delivered the opinion of the court:'

In his petition for rehearing, defendant raises matter which requires consideration in view of the fact that our opinion may have been, as indicated by defendant, the first to construe Linmark as requiring the balancing of the government’s interest in imposing a “For Sale” sign ban ordinance against a person’s first amendment right to engage in commercial speech.

Initially, we note that our opinion should not, as suggested by defendant, be read as saying that the challenged ordinance…