Legal Opinion

Penneys v. Segal

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 19, 1963No. Appeal, 342PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Benjamin R. Jones,

This is an appeal from an order of the Court of Common Pleas No. 4 of Philadelphia County which *310granted a new trial in an assumpsit action upon the ground that the trial court inadequately instructed the jury on the subject of the burden of proof.

Samuel Segal, Jr. (Segal), in November, 1953, received a telephone call from a Mrs. Daoud who is engaged in the jewelry and furniture business, under the name of Daoud Brothers, in Atlantic City and elsewhere. Mrs. Daoud suggested, since the business was in need of ready cash, that Segal might be interested in…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Keefer v. ByersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  2. Putnam v. Ensign Oil Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  3. Morse Boulger Destructor Co. v. ArnoniSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  4. Poelcher v. ZinkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  5. First Nat'l Bank of N.J. v. Cattie Bros.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Coker v. SM Flickinger Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  2. Westinghouse Elevator Co. v. HerronSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  3. United Securities Corporation v. BrutonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1965
  4. Spang & Co. v. USX Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  5. Commonwealth v. DidioSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1968

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API