Legal Opinion
Sevin v. Parish of Jefferson
District Court, E.D. Louisiana
Decided December 16, 2008No. Civil Action 08-802PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND REASONS
SARAH S. VANCE, District Judge.
Before the Court are defendants’ motions to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction over the subject matter, motions to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, and, in the alternative, motions for summary judgment. (R. Docs. 16, 20.) For the following reasons, the Court GRANTS the motions in part and DENIES them in part.
I. BACKGROUND
In June of 2007, Jefferson Parish enacted Chapter 36, Article XI of the Jefferson Parish Code of Ordinances, known as the Automated Traffic Signal Enforcement (“ATSE”) ordinance. The ATSE…
2Cases cited54 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Gary Hughes v. City of Cedar RapidsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2016
- Tim Sosebee v. Steadfast Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2012
- Sevin v. Parish of JeffersonDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2009
- In Re Jefferson ParishCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2023
- Daigle v. Cimarex Energy Co.District Court, W.D. Louisiana · 2018
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.