Legal Opinion

People v. Walker

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 6, 1946No. Crim. 4020PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, P. J.

Having been convicted of murder by a jury appellant assigns as prejudicial errors (1) the insufficiency of the evidence and (2) misleading instructions. The arguments for a reversal revolve around the fact that the homicidal victim was an innocent bystander while the latter’s brother had been the object of appellant’s wrath in an immediately recent brawl.

About 9:30 o ’clock in the evening of September 15, 1945, while Alfred Shaw and a boy were playing pool in a hall on the east side of Wilmington Boulevard near its intersection with 116th Street in the city of Los Angeles, appellant entered…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. SuesserCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  2. People v. SainzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  3. People v. MontezumaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  4. People v. PivaroffCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Gladden v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1974
  2. People v. SuticCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  3. State v. ClokeyIdaho Supreme Court · 1961
  4. State v. GilletteNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1985
  5. People v. NealCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API