People v. Walker
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtMoore, P. J.
Having been convicted of murder by a jury appellant assigns as prejudicial errors (1) the insufficiency of the evidence and (2) misleading instructions. The arguments for a reversal revolve around the fact that the homicidal victim was an innocent bystander while the latter’s brother had been the object of appellant’s wrath in an immediately recent brawl.
About 9:30 o ’clock in the evening of September 15, 1945, while Alfred Shaw and a boy were playing pool in a hall on the east side of Wilmington Boulevard near its intersection with 116th Street in the city of Los Angeles, appellant entered…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- People v. SuesserCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- People v. SainzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- People v. MontezumaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
- People v. PivaroffCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
3Cited by13 opinions
- Gladden v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1974
- People v. SuticCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- State v. ClokeyIdaho Supreme Court · 1961
- State v. GilletteNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1985
- People v. NealCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.