Legal Opinion
Midwest Industrial Painting of Florida, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided December 9, 1983No. 456-81CPublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LYDON, Judge:
Plaintiff brings the present action, pursuant to the Contract Disputes Act, 41 U.S.C. §§ 601-613 (Supp. V 1981), to recover $82,-326.04 plus interest which the government withheld from the final payment on plaintiff’s painting contract with the Department of the Air Force (Air Force).
Plaintiff was the prime contractor on a project at MacDill Air Force Base (MacDill) involving the sandblasting and painting of certain buildings and equipment at said base. Plaintiff subcontracted to another painting contractor, Capitol Maintenance, Inc. (Capitol), the work under the contract…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Alcoa Steamship Company, Inc. v. Charles Ferran & Company, Inc., Charles Ferran & Company, Inc. v. Alcoa Steamship Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
- Elaine Jones v. GriffithCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
- Toyota Industrial Trucks U. S. A., Inc. v. Citizens National Bank of Evans City v. Promat CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
- Todd Shipyards Corp. v. Turbine Service, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
- S. J. Groves & Sons Company v. Warner CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Energy Capital Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2000
- Cates v. Morgan Portable Building Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
- Koby v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
- Citizens Federal Bank v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
- Forest Environmental Services Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1984
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.