Legal Opinion
State v. Dills
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided August 29, 1989No. 7355PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBorden, J.
This case requires us to resolve the apparent conflict between General Statutes § 54-561 and Practice Book §§ 815 (5) and 816.2 That conflict surfaces where, as in this case, the trial court, acting pursuant to General Statutes § 54-56, dismisses before trial an information against a defendant who was arrested pursuant to a warrant.
The defendant was arrested pursuant to a warrant, and an information was filed against him charging him *497with larceny in the second degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-123. The arrest arose out of a transaction between the defendant and Atlantech, Inc., in…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- State v. HaskinsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- State v. AbbatiSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
- State v. MorrillSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- State v. CorchadoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- State v. KingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- State v. KinchenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- State v. MenziesConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992
- State v. JacksonConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995
- State v. HaightConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
- State v. Colton, No. Cr6-289646 (Jan. 5, 1994)Connecticut Superior Court · 1994
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.