State v. Haight
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FOTI, J.
The defendant, Andrew C. Haight, appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after the trial court accepted his conditional plea of nolo conten-dere,1 of operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of intoxicating liquor in violation of General Statutes § 14-227a. The court accepted the defendant’s plea after it denied his motion to dismiss.2 On appeal, the defendant claims that the court improperly denied his motion to dismiss because there was insufficient *237evidence to sustain the charge. We agree and reverse the judgment of the trial court.
The record reflects…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- State v. DeCosterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1960
- Pitchell v. City of HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- State v. EnglehartSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1969
- State v. KinchenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- State v. VickersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. HaightSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- Sengchanthong v. Commissioner of Motor VehiclesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
- Ghimbasan v. S & H EXPRESS, INC.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2011
- State v. HaightSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- State v. HaightConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005