Legal Opinion

Trummel v. Mitchell

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 30, 2006No. 75977-4PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

f 1 Petitioner Paul Trammel challenges the Court of Appeals’ decision upholding the trial court’s antiharassment orders against Trammel brought by respondents Stephen Mitchell on behalf of himself and Council House, Inc., as well as the trial court’s multiple findings of civil contempt. We conclude that the trial court did not *656err in issuing the first antiharassment order providing a no contact zone around Mitchell and Council House. However, we also conclude that the trial court abused its discretion in restraining Trammel from contacting nonparties off premises and in adding content…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. United States v. GraceSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Watts v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. Martin v. City of StruthersSupreme Court of the United States · 1943

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. San Juan County v. No New Gas TaxWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Trummel v. MitchellWashington Supreme Court · 2006
  3. In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against SanaiWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  4. STATE DEPT. OF ECOLOGY v. Tiger Oil Corp.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2012
  5. Buhr v. Stewart Title of Spokane, LLCCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API