Legal Opinion

Schneider v. the Hamilton Trust Co.

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided December 12, 1929PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The Savoy Silk Mills, a corporation, was declared insolvent March 9th, 1925, and the complainant was appointed receiver. The bill is filed to compel the defendant, Hamilton Trust Company, to account for property transferred to it by the corporation while insolvent, in violation of section 64 of the Corporation act.

In the year before, April 1st, the Savoy Silk Mills called a meeting of creditors and made a settlement with all but five at twenty cents on the dollar. The Hamilton Trust Company, a heavy creditor, not included in the settlement, advanced the necessary funds, $20,400, and took a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. John Agnew Co. v. Board of EducationNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1914
  2. Turp v. DickinsonNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1926
  3. Hoover Steel Ball Co. v. Schafer Ball Bearings Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1918
  4. Janes v. FalkSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1892
  5. Collins v. SteuartNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1899

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Schneider v. Hamilton Trust Co. of PatersonNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1934
  2. Havens v. Mohme Aero Engineering Corp.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API