Janes v. Falk
Supreme Court of New Jersey
On appeal from a decree advised by Vice-Chancellor Green, whose opinion is reported in 4, Dick. Ch. Rep. 484.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Dixon, J.
In supplementary proceedings to collect a judgment obtained by James M. Erost against Daniel D. Craig in the New York city court the complainant, Isaac N. Falk, was, on December 2d, 1889, appointed by that court receiver of all the property, real and personal, of said Craig. The New York Code of Civil Procedure enacts:
’’ Section 2468. The property of the judgment debtor is vested in a receiver * * * from the time of filing the order appointing.him * * * Section 2469. Where the receiver’s title to personal property has become vested * * * it…
2Cited by11 opinions
- Hickey v. KahlNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1941
- Eagles B. L. Assn. v. FiduciaNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1944
- West Jersey Trust Co. v. ReadNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1932
- Hudson Trust Co. v. HoltNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1933
- Hanstein v. KellyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1942
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.