Legal Opinion

Remus v. Schwass

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided March 22, 1950No. 31313PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Chiee Justice Thompson

delivered "the opinion of the court:

Appellees, Esther Remus and Mabel Schwass, children of John Schwass, herein referred to as plaintiffs, and R. B. Remus, husband of Esther Remus, filed, suit against Margaret Schwass, widow of John Schwass, and persons incidentally interested, to partition two parcels of property" located in the city of Elmhurst in Du Page County. -' A. cross complaint was filed by Margaret Schwass to reform., the deed to said John Schwass, by which he-took title to. parcel No. 2, hereinbelow described, so as to.show Margaret Schwass to have been a…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Forthman v. DetersIllinois Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Jones v. KoepkeIllinois Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Galbraith v. TracyIllinois Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Lutyens v. AhlrichIllinois Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Mustain v. GardnerIllinois Supreme Court · 1903

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Beloit Foundry Co. v. RyanIllinois Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Scanlon v. ScanlonIllinois Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Cirro Wrecking Co. v. RoppoloIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Chicago Division of Illinois Education Ass'n v. Board of EducationAppellate Court of Illinois · 1966
  5. In Re Estate of MartinekAppellate Court of Illinois · 1986

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API