Glascock v. Sukumlyn
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtMoore, P. J.
Respondent sued to enforce specific performance of an option to purchase shares in a corporation in which both parties were stockholders. From a judgment in his favor, appeal has brought the matter to this court and reversal is urged on several grounds.
Prior to June 21, 1947, respondent and others had organized Dynamic Air Engineering, Inc. On that date, respondent owned over 50 per cent of the issued stock. Appellant was owner of 111 shares. For the sum of $10, appellant on that date executed in favor of respondent an option to purchase all shares of the corporation which appellant then…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Smith v. BanghamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- First National Exchange Bank v. Roanoke Oil Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1937
- Tesseyman v. FisherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- Kruckow v. LesserCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- Marsh v. LottCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Kaneko v. OkudaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
- Stanchfield v. Hamer Toyota, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1995
- Steinmeyer v. Warner Consolidated Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1974
- Lister v. SorgeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- Wheat v. MorseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961