Wright v. L-3 Communications Corp.
District Court, D. New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ORLOFSKY, District Judge. ’
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff, David Wright (“Wright”), has sued his former employer, L-3 Communications Corporation (“L-3”), for age discrimination, in violation of the New Jersey Law Against Discrimination (“LAD”), N.J.S.A. § 10:5-1, et seq. (2002). L-3 has now moved for summary judgment. In deciding L-3’s motion for summary judgment, I must address an unresolved question of the governing New Jersey state law — namely, what is the fourth element of a prima facie case of age discrimination under the LAD? Based on my review of the case law — specifically, a July…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- DeWees v. RCN CORP.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2005
- Monaco v. American General Assurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
- Andrew Jackson v. Amazon.com Services LLCDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2026
- BLOUNT v. TD BANK NADistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2023
- CRONIN v. BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON, INC.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2021
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.