Legal Opinion

Wright v. L-3 Communications Corp.

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided October 21, 2002No. Civil Action 00-5937PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ORLOFSKY, District Judge. ’

I. INTRODUCTION

Plaintiff, David Wright (“Wright”), has sued his former employer, L-3 Communications Corporation (“L-3”), for age discrimination, in violation of the New Jersey Law Against Discrimination (“LAD”), N.J.S.A. § 10:5-1, et seq. (2002). L-3 has now moved for summary judgment. In deciding L-3’s motion for summary judgment, I must address an unresolved question of the governing New Jersey state law — namely, what is the fourth element of a prima facie case of age discrimination under the LAD? Based on my review of the case law — specifically, a July…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  5. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. DeWees v. RCN CORP.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2005
  2. Monaco v. American General Assurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
  3. Andrew Jackson v. Amazon.com Services LLCDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2026
  4. BLOUNT v. TD BANK NADistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2023
  5. CRONIN v. BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON, INC.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2021

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API