Legal Opinion

Scribner v. Palmer

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 16, 1914No. 11993PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Spokane county, Kennan, J., entered November 15, 1913, upon the verdict of a jury rendered in favor of the plaintiffs, in an action for damages for fraud.

1Opinion of the CourtChadwick, J.

— The facts, as the jury must have found them to be, are as follows: Plaintiffs, an aged couple, had lived for more than thirty years at Newman Lake, near Spokane, Washington. They owned a tract of land consisting of about 121 acres, live stock, farm machinery, hay, grain and other personal property, all of the alleged value of $11,-380. They were desirous of disposing of their property and investing the proceeds, and accordingly consulted with defendant, a friend of many years standing and in whom they had great confidence. Defendant was about 45 years of age, had been active in the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Curtley v. Security Savings SocietyWashington Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Grant v. HuschkeWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Robinson Machine Works v. VorseSupreme Court of Iowa · 1879
  4. D. M. Osborne & Co. v. RiderWisconsin Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Frick & Co. v. C. G. Larned & Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1893

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Bullard v. Citizens' Nat. BankMississippi Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Scribner v. PalmerWashington Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Nelson v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Bouckaert v. Burwell & Morford, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Gleason Co. v. CarmanWashington Supreme Court · 1920

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API